Ask Your Dev Team if they're time-and-material or value-based

How your developer charges you isn’t just a billing detail. It reveals how they think about your project and where their incentives lie.

Time and material (T&M)

The most common model in software development. You pay for the hours worked and the resources consumed. It’s straightforward: the developer tracks their time, you get an invoice.

Pros:

• Flexible: easy to adjust scope, pivot direction, or add features
• Transparent: you see exactly where the time goes
• Lower risk for the developer, which can mean lower rates

Cons:

• Unpredictable costs: projects can (and do) run over budget
• Misaligned incentives: the developer gets paid more when things take longer
• Requires active management: you need to stay involved to control spend

T&M works best when the scope is uncertain, the project is evolving, or you need an ongoing partnership rather than a fixed deliverable.

Value-based pricing

The developer prices the project based on the value it delivers to your business, not the time it takes to build. A feature that saves you $500K/year might cost $100K to build, regardless of whether it takes two weeks or two months.

Pros:

• Predictable costs: you know what you’re paying upfront
• Aligned incentives: the developer is motivated to deliver value efficiently
• Outcome-focused: the conversation shifts from “how many hours” to “what’s the impact”

Cons:

• Requires clear scope: changes in requirements can lead to renegotiation
• Higher upfront cost: the developer takes on more risk, which is reflected in the price
• Not every project fits: some work is genuinely hard to scope or value in advance

Value-based pricing works best when the deliverable is well-defined, the business impact is measurable, and you want cost certainty.

The hybrid approach

Many developers use a hybrid model: value-based pricing for well-defined projects, and T&M for ongoing support, maintenance, or discovery work. This can give you the best of both worlds.

What to ask

1. “How do you price your projects?” This opens the conversation. Listen for flexibility and reasoning, not just a number.
2. “What’s included, and what’s not?” Especially with fixed-price or value-based work, understand where the boundaries are.
3. “How do you handle scope changes?” In T&M, this is usually straightforward. In value-based, it requires a change order process.
4. “Can you share examples of past projects and how they were priced?” Real-world examples reveal more than theory.
5. “What happens if the project goes over estimate?” This tells you who bears the risk, and how honest the developer is about the possibility.

The real question

Beyond the model, ask yourself: does this pricing structure incentivize my developer to do great work, or just more work?

The best developers are transparent about how they price, why they chose that model, and how it aligns with your goals. If the pricing conversation feels adversarial, that’s a signal about the relationship to come.

---

Expect better. Build better.